Back to all articles
vulnerabilityMongoDBdatabase-securityCVEmemory-leakcredentials

MongoBleed: Critical MongoDB Vulnerability Leaks Server Memory to Attackers

95% of exposed MongoDB servers remain vulnerable to MongoBleed, allowing attackers to dump passwords, tokens, and credentials without authentication.

CIFER Security Team5 min read

A critical vulnerability in MongoDB is being actively exploited worldwide, allowing attackers to dump server memory and extract sensitive data — including passwords, API tokens, and credentials — without any authentication. As of late December 2025, an alarming 95% of exposed systems remain unpatched.

What is MongoBleed?

MongoBleed (CVE-2025-14847) is a client-side exploit targeting MongoDB's zlib compression implementation. The flaw allows attackers to extract uninitialized heap memory from vulnerable servers simply by knowing their IP address.

What makes this vulnerability particularly dangerous:

  • No authentication required — attackers don't need credentials to exploit it
  • No visible intrusion — the attack doesn't trigger obvious security alerts
  • Sensitive data exposure — memory dumps can contain passwords, tokens, session data, and encryption keys
  • Widespread impact — MongoDB is one of the most popular NoSQL databases globally

The Scale of the Problem

According to the ShadowServer Foundation's latest scan:

MetricValue
Total exposed MongoDB servers78,725
Unpatched/vulnerable servers74,854
Vulnerability rate95%

Cloud security firm Wiz reports that 42% of cloud environments have at least one MongoDB instance vulnerable to MongoBleed, including both publicly exposed and internal-facing systems.

Geographic Distribution

The majority of vulnerable systems are located in:

  1. China — 16,800 systems
  2. United States — 13,300 systems
  3. Germany — 7,200 systems
  4. France — 5,100 systems

How the Attack Works

MongoBleed exploits a flaw in how MongoDB handles zlib compression during the connection handshake. Here's what happens:

Attacker                                MongoDB Server
    │                                        │
    │── Malicious connection request ───────►│
    │                                        │
    │◄──── Uninitialized heap memory ────────│
    │     (contains sensitive data)          │
    │                                        │
    └── Repeat thousands of times ───────────┘
        (extract more memory fragments)

Attack Characteristics

Security teams should monitor for these indicators:

  • High connection volume from a single source IP address
  • Missing client metadata — legitimate clients include metadata, attackers don't
  • Short-term peak activity followed by disconnection
  • Thousands of rapid connections needed to extract meaningful data

The attack requires high connection volumes because each request only returns small memory fragments. Attackers piece together sensitive data from many individual dumps.

Why This Matters for Data Security

MongoBleed exposes a fundamental truth about database security: encryption at rest isn't enough.

Even if your database files are encrypted on disk, the data exists in unencrypted form in memory while the server is running. Memory-based attacks like MongoBleed can bypass:

  • Disk encryption
  • Database-level encryption
  • Network encryption (TLS/SSL)

What Attackers Can Extract

Memory dumps from MongoDB servers may contain:

  • User credentials — usernames and passwords
  • API keys and tokens — service account credentials
  • Session data — authentication cookies and tokens
  • Application secrets — encryption keys, configuration data
  • Cached query results — potentially containing sensitive business data

Immediate Actions Required

1. Patch Immediately

Update to one of these fixed versions:

BranchPatched Version
8.xv8.2.3 or v8.0.17
7.xv7.0.28
6.xv6.0.27
5.xv5.0.32
4.xv4.4.30

2. MongoDB Atlas Users

If you're using MongoDB Atlas (the cloud service), your instances were automatically patched between December 17-18, 2025. No action required, but verify with your MongoDB console.

3. Network-Level Protection

While patching, implement additional safeguards:

  • Restrict network access — MongoDB should never be directly exposed to the internet
  • Use firewalls — limit connections to known application servers only
  • Enable authentication — while MongoBleed doesn't require auth, proper access controls limit attack surface
  • Monitor connections — watch for unusual connection patterns from single IPs

4. Credential Rotation

Assume compromise if your server was exposed:

  • Rotate all database credentials
  • Invalidate active sessions
  • Review API keys and tokens that may have been cached in memory
  • Audit for unauthorized access

Regulatory Timeline

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added MongoBleed to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog. Federal agencies must apply mitigations by January 19, 2026.

Germany's BSI and Australia's ACSC have also issued urgent advisories.

The Bigger Picture: Memory Safety in Database Design

MongoBleed joins a pattern of memory-safety vulnerabilities that have plagued infrastructure software:

VulnerabilityYearImpact
Heartbleed2014OpenSSL memory leak exposing keys
Cloudbleed2017Cloudflare memory leak exposing session data
MongoBleed2025MongoDB memory leak exposing credentials

These vulnerabilities share a common theme: unprotected memory containing sensitive data.

Defense in Depth

Protecting against memory-based attacks requires multiple layers:

  1. Minimize memory exposure — don't keep secrets in memory longer than necessary
  2. Isolate sensitive operations — use hardware security modules or TEEs for cryptographic operations
  3. Assume breach — design systems where extracted data is still useless to attackers
  4. Zero-trust architecture — every component should verify, never trust

Key Takeaways

  • MongoBleed is actively exploited — patch immediately if you haven't already
  • 95% of exposed servers remain vulnerable — don't assume you're in the patched 5%
  • Memory contains secrets — encryption at rest doesn't protect running systems
  • Network exposure is critical — databases should never face the public internet
  • Monitor connection patterns — unusual activity may indicate exploitation attempts

For organizations handling sensitive data, this incident reinforces the need for security architectures that assume components can be compromised. When attackers can dump memory without authentication, traditional perimeter security fails.


Need help securing your database infrastructure? Contact us to learn how CIFER's approach to data protection can help safeguard your sensitive data even when underlying systems are compromised.